Reading Revelation with the Big Picture in View

November 15, 2006

I have a great fascination with the Book of Revelation. I have ever since I was a child. The movie “The 7th Sign” came on television and I wanted to watch it but my mother said no and told me to read the Book of Revelation instead. I have been reading it ever since.

I probably have more commentaries on the Revelation than any other book of the Bible (well… perhaps I have more on Romans but it’s debatable!). I even taught through it once on the Bible Institute level. It has a special place in my heart. No matter what your eschatological schema it is a tremendous message of perseverance and hope for the believer in Jesus Christ.

Now, I am a dispensationalist. I believe in a pre-tribulational, premillennial return of Christ. Yet, over the years I have been departing from the sensational approach to “charting the end times” and other such things.

When I was in Seminary we had to preach a graduating senior sermon. I chose Revelation 4 (and was told I was the only graduate who ever preached out of Revelation). As I was studying it out, I was amazed at the intricacies of the passage. It has incredible imagery that can be mined for centuries! Yet, I sort of had an “ah-ha” moment as I studied the text. I realized the message of the passage was that God was glorious (check it out for yourself). I thought, maybe if I missed the forest for the trees in this passage then maybe I missed it throughout Revelation!

With this new approach in mind (without throwing away my dispensational framework… sorry all you covenant theologians out there!) I planned on preaching through Revelation when I took my last charge as Interim Pastor at Grace Baptist Church in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia. I told someone I was preaching through Revelation and they said, “how can you preach through Revelation? I can understand teaching through it… but preaching through it?” I think his question is reflective of many who “miss the point” of Revelation.

Here’s the kicker. When we get so focused on all the little details (what is the rainbow under the throne, etc.) we miss the big picture. The big picture is that Revelation teaches us more about God than it really does about the end times. Go ahead, try it. Read through Revelation with the picture in mind that it teaches us most about who God is. Take notes. What does each passage teach you about God? When I preached through Revelation to my people we had an incredible time basking in the glory of the Triune God. There is an amazing amount of application in Revelation when we realize it teaches us about God and our response to Him!

So, read Revelation with the big picture in view. Read it knowing that it is a message about the Great God of the Universe and how we are to live in light of who He is! Now, I have not given up my dispensationalism or my eschatological framework. But, I have a new approach when I read my favourite book of the Bible. I read it knowing that I am coming face to face with the Sovereign Glorious God of the Bible and that I must live in fear and service to Him until He calls me home!

Remember, Revelation is more about God than it is about the end-times!


I’ll be Pretty Busy for the Next 5 Years…

November 6, 2006


Well, the application is pretty much in the mail. Lord willing, I hope to begin my Ph.D. in January. My focus is in Baptist History and I’ll be pursuing it at the University of Wales (yes in the United Kingdom). My supervisor is Dr. Michael Haykin of Toronto Baptist Seminary.

My dissertation will be on Andrew Fuller. Fuller, although little known today, was one of the most famous Baptist theologians of the 18th century. Specifically, I hope to focus on how Scripture influenced Fuller’s understanding of the person and nature of Jesus Christ during the numerous Christological debates in which he was involved. The proposed title is, “The Scriptural Influence on Andrew Fuller’s (1754–1815) Views of the Person and Nature of Jesus Christ in the Midst of Christological Controversy.”

This encompasses all that I was looking for in a dissertation topic. It involves 18th century British Particular Baptists; it involves a major name like Andrew Fuller; it revolves around a theological issue (Christology); and it is focused on a number of theological debates. I am very excited about this up-coming change of focus in my life and am very excited to have Dr. Haykin as my supervisor. He has a real passion for Fuller and for increasing study of his life and theology.

I would covet your prayers during my time of study!


Character Counts

October 16, 2006

Character is what is generally missing from the world today. Actions do not have consequences. We emulate those who are famous, make lots of money, and live completely immoral lives. Character is what is missing from our heroes of today. In previous generations, it was character that counted.

That is what makes this book so special. Os Guinness has edited a brief but fascinating book about why character counts. Character Counts: Leadership Qualities in Washington, Wilberforce, Lincoln, and Solzhenitsyn (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1999) gives us some brief essays about the leadership qualities of these four men and why character was one that was indispensable. Each of the four leaders are given two essays about the nature of character in their lives which made them incredible leaders in their own times and in their own ways.

Guinness begins with a helpful introductory chapter where he traces the downfall of good leadership in connection with the loss of character. He writes,

“The essential qualities of a great leader, President Eisenhower said, ‘are vision, integrity, courage, understanding, the power of articulation, and profundity of character.’ We might add other virtues–decisiveness and a sense of providence, for example. But over against all who would omit character from the list, the Christian would respond with an overwhelming conclusion: Character is essential and central to good leadership” (p. 11).

He offers some explanations for the loss of character in leadership today and then at the end of his chapter he offers a solution to the decay of character today: study those leaders of the past who had character. He writes,

“Sterling character is evident in these pages. But there is far more than character here, just as there is far more than teaching. Biography should be a staple in the diet of both disciples and citizens, for great lives do more than teach. They stir, challenge, rebuke, amuse, and inspire at levels of which we are hardly aware. As such, these lives and their reflections show us a leadership to which we can each aspire and a standard by which to hold our present leaders accountable” (p. 22).

What then follows is two essays on each of the four leaders. George Washington, William Wilberforce, Abraham Lincoln, and Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn are all studied and allowed to speak demonstrating how character makes incredible leaders.

Washington gets two essays. First, Alonzo L. McDonald gives us “A Leader for the Multitude” and Paul F. Boller, Jr. gives us “To Bigotry No Sanction.” The first essay serves as a brief biography of the life of Washington. His life was shaped in such a way that he would become a tremendous leader. Yet, there are many men who in their time serve as leaders but are lost in the flow of history to be relegated to the unimportant. Not so Washington. It was his strength of character that made him an ideal leader. Men like Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton may have been better educated and better orators and writers, yet it was Washington who serves as the beginning of a new nation.

The second essay focuses on Washington’s supreme contribution, that of religious toleration and not just toleration but acceptance. Washington, a deist, held as a high hope that America would be a nation that allowed those from all nations and religions safe haven in a country that was open to all. In a speech that is now made famous, he spoke to the Jews of Newport by writing of this religious liberty. He said,

“The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to Mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy, a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoke of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support” (p. 59).

In word and in deed, Washington deserves major credit for establishing the ideals of religious liberty and freedom of conscience for Protestants, Catholics, Jews, and for Deists, freethinkers, and others, all within the American tradition.

William Wilberforce is presented next with the first essay by J. Douglas Holladay on “A Life of Significance.” The second essay by John Pollock is “A Man Who Changed His Times.” Wilberforce is best known for eliminating slave trade in Britain. Holladay offers us a brief look at the life of Wilberforce and gives us seven principles which illuminate why Wilberforce lead a life of significance and how we can live a life of significance today. First, Wilberforce’s life was animated by a deeply held, personal faith in Jesus Christ. Second, Wilberforce had a deep sense of calling that grew into the conviction that he was toe exercise his spiritual purpose in the realm of his secular responsibility. Third, Wilberforce was committed to the strategic importance of a band of like-minded friends devoted to working together in chosen ventures. Fourth, Wilberforce believed deeply in the power of ideas and moral beliefs to change culture through a campaign of sustained public persuasion. Fifth, Wilberforce was willing to pay a steep cost for his courageous public stands and was remarkably persistent in pursuing his life task. Sixth, Wilberforce’s labors and faith were grounded in a genuine humanity rather than a blind fanaticism. Seventh, Wilberforce forged strategic partnerships for the common good irrespective of differences over methods, ideology, or religious beliefs.

“In sum, the life and work of William Wilberforce directly counters the cynical pessimism of our day that an individual is powerless to effect real change” p. 75.

The second essay by Pollock focuses specifically on his work to abolish the slave trade. It is an incredible story of trial, hardship, and heart ache. It would take Wilberforce and his companions 20 years to end the slave trade and the abolition of slavery itself nearly thirty more years. But Wilberforce pressed on against incredible odds. We was opposed by the royal family, most of the cabinet and many of England’s great heroes including Admiral Lord Nelson. Yet his perseverance saw the end of the slave trade on February 23, 1807. The character of this man can be seen at the end of Samuel Romilly’s speech where he contrasted Napoleon to Wilberforce.

“Before Romilly could finish, the house rose as one man and turned toward Wilberforce with parliamentary cheers, “Hear Hear! Hear Hear!” Then somebody gave a most unparliamentary “Hurrah!” and the House erupted in hurrahs. Wilberforce was scarcely aware of it. He sat, head bowed, tears streaming down his face. The bill was carried by 283 votes to 16. The odious slave trade was ended” (p. 84). It was his character that allowed him to rise as one man and with a circle of friends see great change sweep across the British empire. To this day he is a hero, as one said, “the Washington of humanity” (p. 90).

It was the great man Lincoln who would see the abolition of slavery in the United States. Alonzo L. McDonald begins by looking at the life and times of Lincoln in “The Spiritual Growth of a Public Man.” Lincoln, who was a simple man, would become the most spiritual leader of the US. His desire to keep the Union together in the face of a massive Civil War is incredible. He knew that without a unified country, abolishing the evils of slavery would not happen. He was a master of knowing the path to take in an uncertain world. He saw himself as a representative of God to do the good of the Lord in the face of incredible odds, death, destruction, pain and suffering.

Elton Trueblood gives us the second essay called, “Theologian of American Anguish.” Trueblood traces the spiritual development and growth of Lincoln and how his character and spirituality made him the president it did. Lincoln, after his meeting with Eliza Gurney offered his understanding of himself as an instrument of God.

“We are indeed going through a great trial–a fiery trial. In the very responsible position in which I happen to be placed, being a humble instrument in the hands of our Heavenly Father, as I am, and as we all are, to work out his great purposes, I have desired that all my works and acts may be according to his will, and that it might be so, I have sought his aid–but if after endeavoring to do my best in the light which he affords me, I find my efforts fail, I must believe that for some purpose unknown to me, He wills it otherwise. If I had ha my way, this war would never have been commenced; if I had been allowed my way this war would have been ended before this, but we find it still continues; and we must believe that He permits it for some wise purpose of His own, mysterious and unknown to us; and though with our limited understandings we may not be able to comprehend it, yet we cannot but believe, that He who made the world still governs it” (p. 119).

They include Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address and his Second Inaugural Address. Both show the character of this fine leader.

Finally, the life of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn is treated in two essays. One is a biographical look at the famous Russian literary genius by Alonzo L. McDonald, “The Writer Underground.” The second is a selection from Solzhenitsyn’s book “The Oak and the Calf.” This second essay treats the situation that Solzhenitsyn went through in the Gulag in Russia and how he felt it was absolutey necessary that he shared how the Russians treated their people to a Western world that chose to give a deaf ear to the cries of the oppressed peoples.

McDonald provides for us a poem written by Solzhenitsyn when he publicly proclaimed his faith in 1972:

How easy it is to live with You, O Lord.
How easy to believe in You.
When my spirit is overwhelmed within me,
When even the keenest see no further than the night,
And know not what to do tomorrow,
You bestow on me the certitude
That You exist and are mindful of me,
That all the paths of righteousness are not barred.
As I ascend in to the hill of earthly glory,
I turn back and gaze, astonished, on the road
That led me here beyond despair,
Where I too may reflect Your radiance upon mankind.
All that I may reflect, You shall accord me,
And appoint others where I shall fail.

The life of these four men are wonderful examples at how character is so important in the life of a leader. The back of the book gives the call for all to read this book.

“Concerned citizens and all who are eager to raise the level of character in this generation and the next will draw inspiration from these readable essays. Character Counts reveals that adversity, apart from its power to overwhelm, has the potential to reveal true moral character and create life-changing leaders.”

I hope this helpful and enlightening book will be the reading of all of those who care to see character-driven leaders raised up in our lifetime.


Online Dating… Friend or Foe?

September 24, 2006

I have kept to my promise so far to only post when I feel I have something that might be of value to say. This post does not fit necessarily in with the purpose of my blog but I thought sharing my thoughts on this subject might be helpful for some people.

As the popularity of the internet grows, so does internet dating. Many find that their choices for finding a possible mate grow slimmer and slimmer. There just seems to be less and less places to find people that one might be interested in marrying.

The problem has grown to exponential levels for those inside the church. Many find it difficult, if not impossible, to find Christian men and women to meet with the possibility of pursuing a relationship that will lead to marriage. Many conservative churches are small with unfortunately, a limited number of young unmarried people. A bigger problem for those in the independent Baptist movement is that there is little forum for introducing people to each other with those of other churches.

Because of this growing problem, many have turned to the internet to search for God’s choice for husband or wife. Do not get me wrong. God has brought men and women together through the internet. I do not doubt that it can have its benefits; but it can surely have its weaknesses too. Sites like ChristiaNet.com or ChristianCafe.com are meeting places designed to introduce Christian people to other Christian people with the hopes of helping them find who God has chosen for them.

I want to present a few concerns I have with the concept of internet dating. This is not one from the outside looking in, this is the perspective of the one who has been on the inside and is now looking on getting out!

1) The Internet Obscures Reality

The first, and most important problem with Internet dating is simply that the net allows for, even unconsciously, the obscuring of reality. When one interacts with people in person, they are able to see their problems as well as their pluses. When you are communicating on your net, it allows for the obscuring of your foibles. Only the best of the best comes out as you are not forced to interact with the immediacy that in-person conversations bring. Before you send that message, you can re-write it, tweak it, and then send it. The internet simply obscures who you really are. On the internet, you can be anyone; whereas in person, you are simply yourself.

2) The Internet Does Not Allow For Clear Communication

I have found in the past that communication can be wholly unclear on the internet. When you are in person talking, you have body language, facial expressions, and the like which aid in our understanding the other person. On the net, it is so easy to take things out of context because there are no emotions behind it. The use of smiley faces or emoticons hardly help. Simply, conversation via internet hardly communicates intent like conversation in person.

3) The Internet Allows For False Assumptions

When two people are communicating on the internet and allowing themselves to become emotionally attached, it is easy to assume things about the other person without actually knowing them. Interacting in person always reveals who people really are, whereas interacting on such a limited basis as communicating on the internet tends to create in our minds unfounded assumptions about the other person. We may think one thing about the other person and yet be totally wrong once we meet them in person. Face to face always presents a clearer picture of the other person.

4) The Internet Prevents True Depth In A Developing Relationship

It is easy to become attached to a person via the internet. You think you can talk about things you normally do not talk about in the early stages of a relationship when you are with them in person. Yet, in reality, this forms a relationship with breadth but no depth. When all one can do is talk about issues and never truly experience them in real life with another person, they never get a full, deep picture of the other person as they are trying to develop that relationship.

There are probably other issues I could bring up, and the above are all sort of interrelated to the first one, but I feel that these are some major hindrances to online dating.

Well, if online dating might not be the best solution for the Christian to find a mate, then what is? I really do not know the answer to that question. I think a step in the right direction would be for churches to realize the need in their midst. There are single men and women looking for their future wives and husbands and having an incredibly hard time at it. Independent Baptists (of which I am a part of) should be willing to work with churches of like faith and practice to help their young singles have opportunities to meet other young singles.

The best place to meet your potential mate most clearly would be in the context of a local church. What can we do as pastors and leaders in our churches to facilitate that?

Allen Mickle


An Anniversary We Would Like to Forget

September 11, 2006

Today marks the 5th anniversary of the terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001. Here on the east coast, Condoleeza Rice, Secretary of State for the US government, is arriving to commemorate the kindness of the people of Nova Scotia who took people into their homes when their planes were forced to land. At least 5 articles were in today’s Chronicle Herald newspaper.

I recall the event vividly in my own mind even today. I was in class at Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary that day. I was the only Canadian at the school that day. It was if what I heard and saw truly were not happening. I waited for almost 4 hours at the border trying to re-enter Canada. The after effects were immense as crossing the border for a few weeks after that was almost impossible.

It was truly a world event that has affected us all even if we do not realize it. What struck me the most after the event was more theological than anything else. Many church leaders could not fathom that God could have had anything to do with that tragedy. That it must have been out of His control. Now, I know I am not saying anything here that is new. In fact, better men than I have eloquently explained how a sovereign God did control these events. But I want to focus on a few passages of Scripture just to remind us once again, that we serve a God that is sovereign and in control, of the good, and the bad.

Amos 3:6 often resonates in my mind as I think of the relationship of God to world events. It reads, “When a trumpet sounds in a city, do not the people tremble? When disaster comes to a city, has not the Lord caused it” (NIV). Disasters, calamities, and suffering, are not outside of God’s control. We do not serve a God who is impotent, but a God who is omnipotent!

Daniel 4:34b-35 also reminds us of the sovereign control of God. “His dominion is an eternal dominion; his kingdom endures from generation to generation. All the peoples of the earth are regarded as nothing. He does as he pleases with the powers of heaven and the peoples of the earth. No one can hold back his hand or say to him ‘What have you done'” (NIV)? Nebuchadnezzar, the major world leader at the time, realized that God is sovereign and in control of all events. He does as He pleases.

There are many other passages which demonstrate that God is sovereign. He is not weak like Open Theists would argue. Our God does in fact know the future. He knows the future because He has planned the future! That is designed to be a comforting thought, not a troubling thought. God is in control of all events in world history. Even 9/11.

On this 5th anniversary of a terrible event in human history, let us remind ourselves that if God was not in control of that situation, then we serve an impotent God. I do not want to serve an impotent God but an omnipotent God! What an amazing God we serve, the sovereign Lord of the universe! Blessed be the name of the Lord!

Allen Mickle


Ministry: Professional or Theological

September 10, 2006

Being that I am transitioning in some ways in the ministry I have been taking some careful thought to the nature of ministry. Over the course of the last number of months I have been reading David Wells, No Place for Truth: Or Whatever Happened to Evangelical Theology. In that book he takes a great deal of time to investigate the idea of a professional ministry. He demonstrates that the concept of professionalizing the ministry is in fact destroying the very nature of the ministry. He explains that the theological purposes and nature of the ministry are being destroyed in modern evangelicalism by the pursuit of professionalization. He has a very telling section where he wonders aloud what the pursuit of ministry would be like for the apostle Paul if he were alive today.

“We can only guess how well the apostle Paul might have fared had he sought pastoral employment among evangelicals today, but we would not be risking much to suppose that he would start out with a few strikes against him. Happily, there would be a constituency deeply appreciative of his teaching and service. But he would not be without his critics. Indeed, they might very well be numerous. Some churches would doubtless be delighted that he was willing to support himself and leave more of the church budget for other matters, but the ore professionalized congregations would probably be embarrassed by this. Who, they might ask themselves, really wants a cut-rate pastor? Few would warm to his personality, and that would be no small matter. Today, most pastors stand or fall today by their personalities rather than their character. Many would be agitated about his insistence on discipline in the church. Many would be offended by his refusal to grant the legitimacy of each person’s private views so long as they were held sincerely. His insistence that truth is given objectively in Christ, not subjectively through private intuition as the pagans thought, would make him sound strangely out of touch. Indeed, his preaching, judged by contemporary standards, would be considered by many a failure because the brief summaries that we have of what he did show no penchant for telling stories at all. Besides, Paul was apparently in the habit of extending his discourses long beyond the twenty minutes to which many churches would limit him. He would probably end up provoking a churchly insurrection–for all the wrong reasons. Few would be able to make much sense of his concerns with the connections between New Testament faith and Old Testament promises, because the Old Testament is terra incognita in the Church today. His passionately theological mind would get him into trouble on two counts: his preaching would be judged hopelessly irrelevant because its theological focus would put it out of step with modern habits, and his passion would simply prove embarrassing. His vision of God’s purposes in the world, one supposes, would probably seem interesting but, in the small world of church life, not really compelling. And so the difficulties would mount. Paul would probably be condemned to flit from place to place, not out of choice but necessity, never finding secure lodging anywhere, his resume fatally scarred by his many pastoral failures until, abandoned and worn out, he would be left to pass his closing days in a home for the aged” (David F. Wells, No Place for Truth: Or Whatever Happened to Evangelical Theology? [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993], pp. 290-291). Emphasis in original.

The professionalization of the ministry is killing the ministry. The lack of focus on the minister as the pastor-theologian is killing the church. The one called to shepherd and guide the flock into all godliness and to instruct in the knowledge of God through His word is absolutely necessary for a healthy, godly, theologically mindful community of believers.

Our focus, as we pursue the ministry, should be less on mimicking the business world but instead mimicking the example and teachings of the New Testament. It is a sad day we live in when one such as the apostle Paul would be found “ineffective” in the ministry today. Using him as an example, may we constantly be focused on leading our flock into godliness and fulfillment of the mission of the church to make and mature disciples, and to instruct them in the Word and theology. As one of my seminary professors has said, our love of God should increase proportionately to our knowledge of God. Therefore, the pastor is not a professional but a theologian.

I leave you with a remark by John Piper from his fascinating book, Brothers, We Are Not Professionals: A Plea to Pastors for Radical Ministry. This book cannot be more highly recommended for all pastors today.

“We pastors are being killed by the professionalizing of the pastoral ministry. The mentality of the professional is not the mentality of the prophet. It is not the mentality of the slave of Christ. Professionalism has nothing to do with the essence and heart of the Christian ministry. The more professional we long to be, the more spiritual death we will leave in our wake” (John Piper, Brothers, We Are Not Professionals: A Plea to Pastors for Radical Ministry [Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman, 2002], p. 1).

Your Fellow Servant in Christ Jesus,

Allen Mickle


Back on the Web

September 10, 2006

I apologize for being gone so long. I had been doing a lot of thinking about the purposes of blogs as a medium of communication. After much thought and prayer I thought it was necessary to start over. The name of the blog is the same, but hopefully, the posts will be better thought out, more helpful, and overall glorifying to the great God of the universe.

My intention then is to not focus on personal items in my life, but simply communicate my thoughts on the Word, theology, ministry, and church history as I seek to serve the Lord in all that I do. If you have questions, comments, suggestions, or what not, please do not hesitate to e-mail me with them. I want this blog to be helpful to those who read it.

Your Fellow Servant in Christ,

Allen Mickle